This is kind of a shame...the PBS program Reading Rainbow is having trouble finding sponsorship.
In a plea for the life of "Reading Rainbow," host LeVar Burton returned to a familiar setting: the stage where he picked up the PBS show's seventh Emmy Award for best children's television series.
"If you are a wealthy philanthropist out there, I'm not that difficult to find," said Burton, the show's executive producer and host since it began in 1983.
He's still waiting. And "Reading Rainbow," which has counterintuitively used television to introduce children to a world of books, may only have a few months to live.
"Reading Rainbow" has several strikes against it in the battle for funding. For starters, it has no access to merchandise licensing deals, an increasingly important part of PBS' funding scheme for children's shows. There are no "Reading Rainbow" action figures to sell, no "Reading Rainbow" jammies to keep kids warm at night.
The series is also 20 years old when many corporate benefactors prefer being involved with something new. And the show's narrow audience — children 6 to 8 who are just learning to read — doesn't give sponsors the broad exposure they're seeking, said Amy Jordan, senior researcher on children and the media at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center.
Other programs, like "Clifford the Big Red Dog," have book series attached to them. But "Reading Rainbow" is the only one that introduces children to a wide range of literature, Jordan said.
"What `Reading Rainbow' saw, before anybody else saw it, is that you can use this medium of television to get kids excited about reading," she said.
Over the past several years, Burton and his backers have been producing fewer "Reading Rainbow" episodes because money was short. This season, only four new shows were made. The production company has a $2 million annual budget, and no money to go forward, he said.
"We have pieced it together by hook or by crook every year," said Burton, who helped start the series so children, during summer months away from school, could retain what they had learned.
I've watched the program several times with my girls, and it's excellent, if just a bit over their level. Of course, it's probably encouraging that there are enough educational programs out there to represent a vigorously competitive market. I hope Reading Rainbow obtains sponsorship and can continue encouraging kids to read.
On the other hand, the program's dilemma illustrates one of the problems that I, as a faithful public television viewer (and public radio listener) have noticed: Although there's a perception that the medium is government-funded, it mostly relies on private and corporate donations. Yes, my wife and I are members of our local station, but public broadcasting also relies on hefty corporate sponsorship, which means the stations are far from commercial-free, as I believe they should be. I realize that this area marks a philosophical difference between myself and my conservative friends, but I for one believe that a publicly-funded, non-commercial broadcasting system represents a healthy benefit to society that more than justifies the cost.